Consultant — $897
Reusable delivery infrastructure for AI governance engagements.
The full 35-document set plus a white-label licence: rebrand every document as your own and deliver adapted materials to an unlimited number of clients, perpetually. One payment, not a subscription and not per seat.
Who this is for
Independent consultants, boutique advisory firms, MSPs and fractional GRC or AI governance leads who deliver this work repeatedly — and who currently rebuild the same policy, the same inventory, the same risk register and the same Statement of Applicability for every client.
The economics are the point. The drafting layer is identical across engagements; the judgement is not. This removes the first and leaves you the second.
What Consultant adds
Where the licence line sits
If a client is paying you to help build a governance programme and receives adapted documents as part of that work, that is licensed. Redistributing the templates as templates — reselling them as a document product — is not. That line is the same in every tier.
What you still do. Annexwright supplies the documentation architecture. You decide which systems are in scope, who owns them, what your risk appetite is and what you will actually do; you fill the registers, adapt the wording, operate the controls and keep the records. Buying documentation does not make an organization compliant or certified.
On impartiality. If you audit or certify a client's management system, you should not also supply the documentation they are audited against. This tier is built for the implementation side of that line.
Take a complete document first
The four-way crosswalk is a whole file from the paid set — ISO/IEC 42001 mapped to NIST AI RMF, the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 27001, clause by clause, as an Excel workbook. No signup, no email gate.
Common questions
Is it really unlimited clients?
Can I put my own branding on it?
Will you send it to me to evaluate first?
Is there a referral option instead?
How this page was checked. Regulatory dates on this page were taken from the official texts and from the European Commission, the Illinois General Assembly, Texas Legislature Online, the Colorado General Assembly, the California Privacy Protection Agency, the New York State Senate and NYC DCWP, and were last reviewed on 2026-09-23. Where a date is an applicability or compliance deadline rather than an entry-into-force date, the page says so. Regulation changes; check the primary text before relying on any date for a decision. Nothing here is legal advice.